There is a quote that has circulated among many of us since the last Leadership Retreat, "You have to get smaller to get bigger." The quote encapsulates the notion that congregational leadership has to discover ways to involve its members in smaller, intimate group gatherings rather than continue to function solely as one homogenous unit. The outreach of the congregation is carried out by way of these smaller, integrated units. A key objective is to see that all members are "members" of at least one smaller group effort. Unless this "discovery" is made, the congregation will stagnate at a particular population. What is the nature of these small groups and how exactly might they function? The possibilities are limitless. As it is with most things, what works well for one congregation does not work at all for another.
Looking forward to this year's Leadership Retreat, I firmly believe that this is our challenge. How do we break down the work of the Sunshine Church into smaller, intimate work groups? I think its fair to say that the leaders of Sunshine are struggling to adapt to such a model. We are small town people. We grew up apart of a small church, we attended small schools, and we most often deal with small businesses. We are familiar with life in a small town, most of us can get around in the big town, but it is not our natural habitat (Shall we all join hands a sing together a couple verses from John Mellenkamp's "Small Town"?).
Generally, we are down on big cities, big churches, and big businesses. Not to exaggerate the point here, but I feel that its important for us to acknowledge that small is more than preference for us, it is a value. We are suspicious even resentful of one who would come in offering a better idea or method. Simultaneously, we will acknowledge that we have much to learn and stand in need of guidance. Consequently, we are basically sincere when we say we want to grow, yet, at a deeper level, we are resistant to the changes such growth entails. I am confident making this observation because I see it most clearly in myself. I am not adept at working in larger scales.
I have been deeply involved in the work of Sunshine, both before and after my college stints. Yet during the college years, I never involved myself in the work of the large congregations that I attended. It was not a conscious choice on my part. Looking back, I can see that I felt like a fish out of water. I had no skills for finding a role within the context of the large congregations. I did not know how to do what I did at Sunshine in this new environment. I also can now admit I harbored a subtle negative attitude about these congregations. The attitude stemmed from my blaming my lack of connectedness on the large congregation rather than on my stubborn rigidity. I was a small town guy with limited abilities to cope with life in the big congregation.
I recognize these things now because I am no longer stuck in the pattern of thinking that characterized me in those days. I can now think a bit more creatively about how I might serve and how church might look. What we are getting at here is a paradigm shift. We are reaching for a new pattern of thinking about congregational life, ministries, and evangelism. None of us have the answers. Let's begin by admitting that fact!
This is good stuff. We are flirting with growth, deeper relationships, salvation of friends and family, the very power of God at work in us. This is why time moves forward. God's kingdom is still breaking into our world, even Minford. Can we catch this higher vision? A vision that captivates our imagination and commands the best of our energy. Surely, we want all that God would give us? I do! I know others who do!
I offer these thoughts in hope of stimulating a discussion. A discussion about Sunshine's present and future. Ultimately, I hope to generate enthusiasm as we build up to this year's retreat. Please join in this discussion. We need each other as we need our Lord.
P.S. Patrick Mead has written about changes of thinking within his own congregation -> here
Friday, July 14, 2006
A bright future
Posted by
Unknown
at
10:15 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
A couple of things on this...
I work in the field of higher education and deal consistently with both large and small groups of people daily. Incidentally, I can confidently state that smaller is only better so long as it recognizes its role as part of the whole. Otherwise it becomes a pointless association. Also, I am somewhat skeptical of large churches and their ability to involve/include everyone meaningfully. It seems to me (from experience) that when a group becomes so large that small groups are necessary to guarantee a certain amount of intimacy between members, cliques become likely.
This leads me on to a slightly different point. I personally feel that there is such a thing as a "too big" church. Cliques become inevitable - as well as "in" groups and "out" groups. We have them at Sunshine - although not to the degree of many churches. I have a real problem with the rationale behind mega-churches. Is it a congregation's mission to grow so large that it begins functioning at a bureaucratic level. When a congretation grows - why would it build larger buildings when some of the members could move and help revive some dying congregations to become effective in their communities. In many areas this is quite possible.
Excellent post & good discussion topic.
Eric
Eric said "When a congretation grows - why would it build larger buildings when some of the members could move and help revive some dying congregations to become effective in their communities."
I think this is a very interesting concept. If we really see the church "as a whole" and not as "I go to this building and you go to that building", I think it would be easier to move to other church buildings and work with our brothers and sisters who are aging and "dying out" in their congregations. Lily Chapel is a good example of this kind of situation. Here is a congregation whose membership is slowly dwendling away because the people are aging and the young are moving away and going to college or getting married. Anytime members of Sunshine attend Lily's worship services, the faces on the elderly brighten. It's as though they see hope for their congregation to maintain itself. Possibly in the hopes of a few of us wanting to attend their on a regular basis and help them work.
It would be great if several of us would choose to start attending Lily instead of Sunshine. At the same time, I would hate to see any of you go....or if I were to leave you all.
I guess it all boils down to what we're willing to do for the sake of our comfort zone and our "cliques". Can or will we really leave one another? Should we?
Jennifer
Great comments. Both of you mentioned the problem of cliques within our fellowship. Obviously, we have them. I think they are inevitable. A small group model would attempt to capture these members who naturally hang together for kingdom service. Involve them in a work that fits within the larger goals/ purposes/ principles of the Sunshine congregation. Easier said than done, but I hope you get the idea.
Leadership, working within this paradigm, would focus on coordinating the work of these various groups, making sure all members have access to involvement to the ministries they desire, and all this serves a unified purpose. It involves a tremendous amount of delegation of responsibility to group/ministry leaders.
Bear with me, I am just stabbing at ideas here.
About the idea of working with the other "brotherhood" congregations. It is a wonderful thought, but, I cannot see it working. We have doctrinal issues with regard to "our" elders overseeing the work of other congregations. I think we could navigate those waters, but not anytime soon. Also, it gets complicated when we start getting intimate with other congregations. We are an instutionally liberal CofC, at least in Scioto County, we are conservative when viewed against a broader backdrop. I just do not think we would be fully accepted. I could be way off base here. What are you thinking?
Two years ago, Deanna and I moved and began attending a large C of C (~700 members) in South Denver. At first I was concerned that we would get lost in the crowd and not feel that we were part of the family, but the opposite has been true. Our church has "Life Groups" that meet on Wednesday nights instead of having regular church. The groups are made up of about 10 - 15 families and were initially created based on where people live. The benefit to this is that you get a broad spectrum of people in each group. The elders also make an effort to sort of "rotate" through groups so that they can offer their wisdom and listen to ideas. Combined with our Sunday morning "Young Married's" class, we've made a lot of connections in a short period of time. There are plenty of opportunities for service and growth. Overall, these groups have worked well for our church and I think that it is one reason the church continues to grow at a remarkable pace. I've always enjoyed worshipping at Sunshine and with the great people that you have there. Dealing with growth is a great problem to have.
Thanks Josh for sharing your experience. We need to hear things like that.
Post a Comment